JD Vance received tonight’s vice presidential debate. That’s what folks on social media are saying. Even CNN says so.
Nonetheless, as you may think, the oldsters at MSNBC had been in full denial of actuality, saying Tim Walz received the talk.
It doesn’t matter what occurs, they’ll say that. Trump and Vance merely can not admit the reality if it seems to be of their favor.
Who is aware of if they really consider what they’re saying right here?
Listed here are Maddow’s post-debate feedback:
Rachel Maddow: “On each substantive subject, J.D. Vance was diplomatic, and Tim Walz beat him on each substantive subject.” pic.twitter.com/LV4dYHd1Xx
— PostMillennial (@TPostMillennial) October 2, 2024
This is Pleasure Reid, naturally appearing crazier:
Reed: J.D. Vance did not say something memorable. These are plain lies. He was surpassed by Tim Walz. Walz received the talk as a result of he was relatable and had substance. He behaves fairly and pragmatically pic.twitter.com/4KEkuLgJZg
— Kamala Headquarters (@KamalaHQ) October 2, 2024
That is virtually past imitation.
It could be a win for Vance if he did not say something memorable, as a result of essentially the most memorable factor Walz stated was that he was a “moron” and “stated the unsuitable factor” about Tiananmen Sq. What occurred in Hong Kong throughout the Holocaust. https://t.co/i6VaaofAk5
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) October 2, 2024
MSNBC is a joke.
