An inside investigation carried out by Yashwantrao Chavan Memorial Hospital (YCMH) has discovered no wrongdoing within the issuance of incapacity certificates to sufferers. IAS trainee officer Puja Khedkar.
The investigation, led by hospital director Dr Rajendra Wable, was launched after questions emerged concerning the incident. the validity of the certificates, The doc declared Hedka to have a 7 p.c incapacity. The investigation was carried out on the orders of the district collector, who sought clarification on the matter.
Dr. Wabre reported that the hospital adopted customary procedures in issuing the certificates and there was no proof of wrongdoing or error by hospital workers.
He clarified {that a} 7 p.c incapacity certification doesn’t meet the baseline incapacity customary, which requires no less than 40 p.c to qualify for sure training or employment advantages.
Moreover, Dr. Wapur additionally spoke about allegations that Khedkar submitted fraudulent paperwork, together with cast ration playing cards and presumably cast Aadhaar playing cards. He mentioned the hospital’s duty didn’t embrace verifying the originality of such paperwork and that such inspections have been past the hospital’s remit.
Controversy surrounding IAS probationary officer Puja Khedkar consists of feedback on Use of false incapacity and caste certificates Clear up the civil service. Khedkar, an IAS trainee officer of the 2023 batch, has been accused of misusing the Different Backward Class (OBC) and Individuals with Benchmark Disabilities (PwBD) quota.
She additionally faces costs from the Crime Department of Delhi Police for allegedly submitting false data to the Union Public Service Fee (UPSC) to acquire extra seats within the civil providers examination than allowed.
A single-member committee appointed by the central authorities is conducting additional scrutiny of Khedekar’s paperwork. Earlier this month, after the officer was transferred to Washim district from Pune, he confronted complaints for inappropriate habits in the course of the probationary interval, together with misuse of a non-public automotive with beacon lights and requesting amenities to which the probationary officer was not entitled. , she got here beneath public scrutiny.
(With inputs from Shrikrushna Panchal)
